15 May 2009

Let's get it over with...indict this frothing madman.

Dick Cheney may not be the most reprehensible human alive, given that he has to work within a functioning democracy and therefore isn't free to exercise his will like those thugs he supported like Pinochet and Botha, and those still living who continue to represent living evil, like the Burmese Junta, Kim Jong-il, and their ilk. So he still has some betters, living and dead, within the Ministry of Evil, but in American politics he may be the worst we have. Ruthless, remorseless, relentless.

Cheney has been out there telling anyone who will listen that torture isn't torture, and besides we got lots of great information from it...blah blah froth sneer blah.

Now Lawrence Wilkerson, a former aide to Colin Powell is coming out with revelations that the focus of the torture program wasn't gaining information to safeguard America, but rather to gain information to justify the absolute boondoggle and vain blunder that was the illegal Iraq War:
"Its principal priority for intelligence was not aimed at preempting another terrorist attack on the U.S. but discovering a smoking gun linking Iraq and al Qaeda," Wilkerson wrote in The Washington Note, an online political journal.

So says CNN. Well, we all know how that turned out: Bush and Cheney were unable even with torture to uncover any link between formerly-US supported strongman Saddam Hussein and 9/11. I seriously don't know how many prescription pharmaceuticals were being consumed in the White House during this time, but I'm fairly certain that even a college-bound senior, given an assignment to investigate Hussein and Islamic fundamentalism, would be able to figure out that Hussein's government, brutal and totalitarian though it may be, was largely secular and a target of criticism from al-Qaeda and the like.

All torture could hope to produce in this case would be false confessions, which shows how cynical and at bottom criminal Cheney actually is. It really is time to indict him.

4 comments:

Lonnie Bruner said...

That first paragraph is great. I read it twice.

Foilwoman said...

Aw, c'mon: Andrew Jackson denying the Supremes ruling prior to the Trail of Tears? At least equivalent in evilness and repugnantness. But I agree, they didn't have his jowls. And he is a loathsome toad (who will never, ever turn into a prince). I'm watching the Newshour's commentary on the Big Very Little Dick right now, so more later.

m.a. said...

I always learn so much from you. And you're right. Cheney scares me more now that he is not VP. I didn't think it was possible.

ARISTIONO NUGROHO said...

Hi friend, peace...
Your post very interesting. If you willing read and comment my new post please, at http://sosiologidakwah.blogspot.com